Right Brain, Left Brain Blog

3 posts categorized "Sponsorship"

26 August 2016

Rio 2016 Olympics: Which brands made the podium?

Coca-Cola, the longest-standing sponsor of the Olympics, was the most successful brand sponsor at Rio 2016, with the best performing TV ads among US viewers, according to a recent study by Google.

Based on an analysis of the top 12 most advertised brands based on NBC’s broadcasts of this year’s summer games, Coca-Cola’s “That’s Gold” campaign performed the best across the board with strong full-funnel performance placing based on analysis across three specific areas of performance.

Continue reading "Rio 2016 Olympics: Which brands made the podium?" »

04 April 2016

Why sponsors want more out of sports sponsorship

The internet and social media mean the sporting event itself is now just the tip of the overall fan experience, and traditional sponsorship models are simply no longer delivering, says Sporting Mouth’s John Owrid.

We recently learned that Adidas aren’t that enamoured with the way Manchester United are currently playing football. While it hasn’t stopped them selling record numbers of United shirts, the associative values of the team’s performance apparently aren’t in line with the sponsor’s stripes.

Although it’s a story that probably gained more prominence due to a slow news week, it foreshadows something that has been brewing for quite a while, that all is not entirely rosy in the world of sports sponsorship.

Ever since the FIFA scandal broke and football’s leading brand sponsors discovered that their financial support had been unconsciously funding corruption within the game’s governing body, there have been some uncomfortable questions to answer about the value of sponsorship. Whether FIFA (and potentially UEFA’s) own tainted brands have adverse knock-on effects for the brands that sponsor their tournaments is way too early to tell. But at the very least, the brands that continue to support tournaments, such as the World Cup and the European Championships, must be especially keen to see how their loyalty is refunded.

That said, the bigger concern for brands isn’t about whether to continue to pay the tax levied by FIFA and UEFA for their involvement in key tournaments, but how to deal with the fact the traditional sponsorship model is increasingly inapplicable to the task in hand.

Very crudely, sponsorship works by providing brands with special access to something that contains positive associative values for their customers. It’s like a backstage pass that they can share with the people that matter to them. And the most successful brands use this pass very well, creating experiences for fans that are rare and unique. But does taking fans closer to the action equate to helping brands get closer to the fans?

The problem with major tournaments, such as the forthcoming Euros, is that the event itself is so pervasive that access doesn’t seem such a big deal any more. While many of next summer’s official sponsors will be competing with one another to provide the most authentic fan experiences at the tournament, the majority of fans won’t be attending the games. Instead, they’ll be consuming the Euros as a variety of social experiences in their own virtual stadia, using their own technology to propel their involvement in the action.

Instead of getting even more pitch side with their marketing focus, brands might want to explore the case for sponsoring the social connection between fans as an alternative. By reversing the polarity of the traditional sponsorship model to sponsor fan behaviour, instead of event-based phenomena, brands can cut out the middleman (in this case UEFA) and connect with fans direct.

If there’s a better way to capitalise on a huge sporting bubble, with double the shelf life of Christmas, without paying for the privilege of being Santa’s little helper, then it probably isn’t legal.

John Owrid is chairman of Sporting Mouth, which is soon to launch social gaming app Europundit for Euro 2016.

21 December 2015

Did you hear the one about the Englishman, Welshman and Irishman all being at Euro 2016?

For once, this is not a joke or pipedream. We have three ‘home’  nations competing in the UEFA European Championship Finals for the first time heightening rivalry and making the tournament potentially even more valuable for brands. But are the official channels the best route to take or are there more cost effective, creative and engaging alternatives? Sporting Mouth’s John Owrid investigates…

The draw for any major tournament is always hotly anticipated by football fans, and none more so than that for the 2016 UEFA European Championship Finals with more nations than ever taking part this year. It has ignited the imagination of British football fans in particular, with three home nations having qualified – England, Wales and Northern Ireland – for the first time, plus near neighbour Ireland also taking part.

France 2016 will take British home nation rivalry to a new level, particularly in light of the draw pitching England and Wales in the same group. More nations and heightened competition within the UK creates arguably the biggest opportunity for brands ever at the Euros. The problem is that the official UEFA sponsorship opportunities are limited and fought over rabidly, with the winners charged huge amounts to take up a slot.

So if you’ve missed out, either through being beaten to it by other brands or because you’ve been priced out of the market, does that mean your Euro 2016 is over even before a ball has been kicked? As far as official sponsorship goes, yes. But is that such a bad thing?

There are so many brands competing for the attention of fans through official channels that your campaign needs to be very special to stand out and many tend to blur into one. Also, official opportunities don’t tend to offer anything particularly creative, and are quite traditional, using TV and pitch-side advertising that fans have become highly adept at tuning out of whether they’re at the match or watching from their sofa. This suggests, therefore, that brands currently aren’t getting the best value for money through the massive spend they are placing via official channels.

Continue reading "Did you hear the one about the Englishman, Welshman and Irishman all being at Euro 2016?" »

About this blog

  • Right Brain, Left Brain sums up the dichotomy of a media business that’s constantly battling with the challenge of delivering a profit and discovering new ways to communicate to consumers. The Cream editorial team combined with a dream team of industry pioneers from around the world share their expert opinions.

Cream Subscribers

Other C Squared Products

C Squared logo

© C Squared Holdings Ltd.

115 Southwark Bridge Rd,
London, SE1 0AX.

Registered Number: 5272863
VAT REG NO: GB127 6174 12

Made with Fantastic Thinking